Merced River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Comments by Congressman McClintock

Congressman Tom McClintock today submitted the attached letter commenting on the Merced River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement.
 

April 12, 2013 

Don Neubacher, Superintendent
Attn: Merced River Plan
P.O. Box 577
Yosemite, CA 95389

Dear Mr. Neubacher:

I am writing to provide comments on the National Park Service’s (NPS) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Merced River Comprehensive Management Plan.  Yosemite National Park is a national treasure that must be available for the American public to access and enjoy in the same manner that Americans have for decades.   The 1864 Act authorizing the original Yosemite land grant to the State of California stated that the “premises shall be held for public use, resort, and recreation” and “shall be inalienable for all time.”  The draft plan in question directly contravenes the authorization, and I am firmly against NPS taking any action that would limit public access and enjoyment of Yosemite.

Congress enacted the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to protect free-flowing rivers from dams and other development.  Congress did not intend for NPS to use the Act to justify limiting visitation, closing facilities and eliminating or curtailing historic uses that pre-date passage of the Act and the Merced River designation under the Act.   In designating the Merced River, Congress understood that Yosemite National Park had a multitude of existing facilities that served River users, that Yosemite was widely visited and that the Merced River was extensively used for recreational pursuits by Park visitors.  See S. Rep. No. 96, 100th Cong, 1st Sess. 1987 (the river is an “outstanding and heavily used recreation resource in the areas of easy accessibility”).

The Merced River’s designation was based upon the River’s value as a popular recreation resource in a highly-visited National Park that was supported by the extensive facilities that existed at the time of the River’s designation.  Congress could not have intended for NPS to limit visitation or do away with the existing facilities and the recreational activities that support the values that caused the Merced River to be designated in the first place.  Congress also did not intend its designation to drive planning of the larger Park and force the closure of facilities that pre-date the Act, enhance visitor experiences, and are located outside of the Merced River.

It is equally troubling that NPS is proposing to close a number of facilities within Yosemite Village and reduce recreational activities in the Yosemite Valley.  NPS claims that camping will be increased to 640 campsites but that figure is still less than the 830 campsites that existed before the 1997 flood.  NPS is also proposing to close the Curry Village ice skating rink, bike rental facilities, snack stands, swimming pools, tennis courts, retail stores and horse stables and stock use.  These facilities are not located in the Merced River, do not impede its flow, and many existed and historically served Yosemite visitors for decades prior to Congress passing the Act.   

It defies logic that NPS is proposing to close these facilities not because they degrade the Merced River, but instead because in NPS’s eyes, these longstanding facilities do not benefit the River.  What about the benefits that the American public will lose under NPS’s proposal?  NPS is also proposing to eliminate commercial rafting on the River.  Like the existing facilities, commercial rafting is a service that was offered before the Merced River’s designation under the Act.

I am also concerned about the proposed destruction of the Sugar Pine Bridge.  This historic stone bridge was built in 1928 (40 years before enactment of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act) and was entered into the National Register of Historic Places in 1977.  The National Historic Preservation Act directs federal agencies to preserve the historic properties under their control and the legislation designating the Merced River as Wild and Scenic does not require the bridge’s destruction.  I do not believe that the Park Service may simply ignore its responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act to protect the Sugar Pine Bridge and find no justification for robbing Yosemite of this iconic landmark.  

Finally, I am aware that NPS has received a number of requests for an extension of the public comment period on the Merced River plan.  This is entirely understandable given that the plan and its exhibits are over 4,000 pages long, and that the comment period overlaps with the comment periods of two other major Yosemite Park plans.  To ensure that the public has an adequate opportunity to provide its input, I concur that an extension is necessary, and therefore have requested that NPS extend its public comment period on the Merced River Plan by 90 days to ensure full public opportunity to comment on this important issue.

I submit these comments greatly troubled by the adverse and lasting effects this would have on Yosemite and the many visitors who enjoy the park.

Sincerely,

Tom McClintock

Click for PDF copy

 

  

 

Tele-townhall banner 

Latest News

California Energy

Oversight Hearing: Energy Independence - Domestic Opportunities to Reverse California's Growing Dependence on Foreign Oil

2015 Budget

In August of 2010, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs warned that the greatest threat to our national security was our national debt. That was $4 trillion of debt ago. In fact, since Inauguration day, 2009, we have accumulated more total government debt than we had run up from the first day of the Washington Administration through the third year of the George W. Bush administration.

Baseline Budgeting H.R. 1871

Our Constitution assigns the principle responsibility over the public purse to the House of Representatives. Under that Constitutional doctrine, a dollar can't be spent by this government unless the House says it gets spent. Yet today, spending increasingly seems to be out of our hands - driven automatically by a variety of provisions and practices that thwart the very design of the Constitution.

View more »

Search

Connect with Tom

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • News Feed

Upcoming Events

 
Oakhurst Town Hall Meeting

Congressman McClintock will hold a town hall meeting in Oakhurst on Wednesday, April 23rd at 6:00 pm. The meeting will be held at Oakhurst Elementary School, 49495 High School Road, in Oakhurst. Hope to see you there!

Veterans Forum

An advocacy forum for Veterans will be held on April 17th in Truckee.  The forum, assembled by Congressman McClintock's office, will provide Veterans with the information they need to access the benefits they have earned.
 
Representatives from Nevada County and Placer County Veterans' service offices will join the Congressman’s staff to provide information on filing claims with the Veterans Benefits Administration.  Service providers and community program sponsors that help active duty military, wounded warriors and military families will also be present.
 
The forum will be held April 17th from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm at Truckee Airport in the Experimental Aircraft Association Building, 10356 Truckee Airport Road in Truckee.  
 
Satellite Office Hours

Office staff members are available to assist constituents with problems or concerns at satellite office locations held throughout the district.  Anyone wishing to discuss an issue of federal concern is invited to attend one of these satellite office sessions and speak with a member of staff.  For more information, or to reach staff, please call the district office at 916-786-5560.
  
Upcoming Satellite Office Hours Scheduled for April 2014:
 

Amador County

Jackson
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
Conference Room D
County Administration Center
810 Court Street
 
Calaveras County

San Andreas
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
11:00 am - 1:00 pm
Calaveras County Water Agency Conference Room
120 Toma Court
 
El Dorado County

Placerville
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
10:00 am - 12:00 pm
El Dorado County Government Center
330 Fair Lane
 
El Dorado Hills
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
El Dorado Hills Chamber of Commerce
2085 Vine Street, #105
 
South Lake Tahoe 
Monday, April 21, 2014
11:00 am - 1:00 pm
South Tahoe Public Utility District
1275 Meadow Crest Drive
 
Fresno County

Auberry 
Thursday, April 17, 2014
3:00 pm - 4:00 pm
Auberry Library
33049 Auberry Road
 
Madera County

Oakhurst 
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
2:30 pm - 4:00 pm
Yosemite Visitors Bureau Conference Room 40637 Highway 41
 
Coarsegold 
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Yosemite Lakes Park/Clubhouse Library
30250 Yosemite Springs Way
 
Mariposa County

Mariposa
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
11:00 am - 12:00 pm
Library Conference Room
4978 10th Street
 
Placer County

Auburn
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 
9:00 am - 11:00 am
Placer County Government Center 
CEO 3 Meeting Room
175 Fulweiler Avenue
 
Lincoln 
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
3:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Lincoln City Hall
600 6th Street
 
Loomis 
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
9:00 am - 11:00 am 
Loomis City Hall
3365 Taylor Road
 
Rocklin 
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
3:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Rocklin City Hall
3980 Rocklin Rd
 
Tuolumne County

Sonora 
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
Small Business Center Conference Room
99 N Washington St, Sonora
 
For further information on satellite office hours, please call 916-786-5560.